lclscandale.com
March 23, 2012 by Admin

Insurance Agent Convicted in Annuity Case Involving 83-Year-Old Dementia Patient

Independent insurance agent Glenn A. Neasham has been convicted for felony theft for selling a complex annuity to an elderly woman who was suffering from dementia. Neasham, who maintains that the woman seemed fine when the transaction was made in 2008, contends and that he acted appropriately. Now, other insurance agents say they are having second thoughts about offering this financial product.

“Indexed” annuities are savings products that pay interest tied to how the stock- and bond-market indexes perform. An insurance agent gives the buyer a guarantee that the latter won’t lose any principal as long as the investor doesn’t withdraw his/her money early when steep penalties would otherwise ensue.

A lot of insurance agents like annuities because they can earn high commissions (12% or greater of the amount invested).from insurance companies. Annuity sales have increased by over four times in the last 10 years as a volatile stock market and low interest rates attracted buyers.

The Wall Street Journal says that in the mid-2000’s, state attorneys and private plaintiffs sued insurers for making allegedly unsuitable product sales to elderly persons, who ended up losing money due to withdrawal penalties. The insurance companies settled the cases by agreeing to make a number of changes, including employing better efforts to make sure that the products sold to investors were suitable for them.

Neasham claims that the elderly client, Fran Schuber, came to his office with her boyfriend, Louis Jochim, who is also an octogenarian. Jochim said Schuber wanted an annuity like the one he had purchased from Neasham. Jochim told Neasham that the girlfriend was “mentally competent, and the insurance agent said that no one told him, not even Schuber’s son, that she was suffering from dementia.

Yet according to a local bank manager’s complaint, when Jochim and Schuber went to the bank to withdraw 5,000 to buy the annuity, she seemed confused and Jochim appeared to be influencing her. The manager notified Adult Protective Services about her concerns regarding Jochim and the Lake County District Attorney’s Office became involved.

Neasham wasn’t charged with the crime until 2010. Prosecutors contended that Neasham knew at the time of that firs transaction that Schuber lacked the capacity to agree, to it and Lake County Senior Deputy District Attorney Rachel Abelson said the 8% commission that was in it for the insurance agent was the incentive for his “criminal intent.”

At Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas, our elder financial fraud lawyers represent senior investors that have been the victims of all types of securities fraud. Unfortunately, there are loved ones and financial professionals that will take advantage of an elderly person’s lack of knowledge, dependence, or diminished mental capacity to defraud them.

Annuity Case Chills Insurance Agents, The Wall Street Journal, March 18, 2012

Insurance Agent Gets Jail Time for Selling Annuity to Elderly Woman; He Denies Recognizing Dementia, ABA Journal, March 20, 2012


More Blog Posts:

Texas Securities Fraud Over Sale of Allegedly Bogus Annuities to Elderly Seniors, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, December 14, 2011

AG Edwards & Sons (Wells Fargo Advisors) to Settle Securities Charges it Sold Variable Annuities that Lacked Proper Documentation to Elderly Clients, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, May 4, 2011

SIFMA Wants FINRA to Take Tougher Actions Against Brokers that Don’t Repay Promissory Notes, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, January 17, 2012


Stock Broker Fraud Blog

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
February 28, 2012 by Admin

Subrogator Magazine: How to Make Jurors Care About a Property Insurer’s Case

Paul Falk and Bradley Arnold of Falk Metz LLC were recently published in Subrogator Magazine, contributing an article titled How to Make Jurors Care About a Property Insurer’s Case. It’s an insightful article on the difficulty of making a juror relate to the plight of an insurance company, which is often seen as the profitable [...]
Sequence Inc. Fraud Files Blog

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
January 27, 2012 by Admin

Jury Trial Begins in Ponzi Scammer Allen Stanford’s Criminal Case

Two-and-a-half years after he was arrested for allegedly running a billion Ponzi scam, the criminal trial of Allen Stanford has begun. The Texas financier is charged with 14 counts of fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and conspiracy. He denies any wrongdoing.

Stanford is accused of issuing billion in fraudulent CDs through his Antigua-based Stanford International Bank to investors in over a hundred nations. He then allegedly defrauded them.

Even since his arrest these investors have not recovered any of their money. According to Reuters, a guilty conviction won’t necessarily help his Ponzi victims recoup their losses. Hopefully, however, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s lawsuit against the Securities Investor Protection Corp. will remedy this.

The SEC wants SIPC, the broker industry-funded fund, to accept the securities claims made by Stanford’s victims. Meantime, SIPC maintains that it has no jurisdiction over the Stanford case. (Also, this week, arguments over that lawsuit will begin in federal court, and Judge David Hittner, who is presiding over the criminal case against Stanford has overruled a motion by the government to keep the decision in the SIPC v. SEC case off-limits.)

The prosecution says that Stanford promised investors that they would get higher returns if they bought CDs through the Antigua bank (compared to the returns coming from US bank CDs). The money from these CD sales was then used pay off earlier investors and financially support Stanford’s other businesses. He also allegedly used investors’ money to pay for expensive vehicles, luxury residences, and women.

Stanford and three of ex-company executives are accused of trying to cover up their wrongful actions through bogus bank records and with bribes to auditors and regulators in the form of Super Bowl tickets, other perks, and money (over million). The Ponzi scam collapsed in 2008 when his bank ran out of funds and investors stopped receiving payments.

Meantime, Stanford’s defense attorneys are arguing that he wasn’t running a Ponzi scam. They claim that Stanford’s investment operation was legitimate.

His legal team is instead blaming the financial scheme on former Stanford International Bank CFO James M. Davis, who has already pleaded guilty to charges of securities fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, and conspiracy to obstruct a SEC investigation. Davis, who struck a plea deal in his criminal case, is expected to testify for the prosecution during Stanford’s trail.

Stanford, who has been behind bars for the last two-and-a-half years, was declared fit for trial in December. His case had been delayed so he could recover from a medication addiction and from injuries he sustained after he was involved in a jail brawl.

If you are an investor that suffered losses as a result of the Stanford Ponzi scam or any other financial scheme, do not hesitate to contact our securities fraud lawyers right away.

Prosecutors say Texas financier Stanford, stole investors’ money in billion Ponzi scheme, The Washington Post, January 24, 2012

Stanford trial starts, cold comfort for investors, Reuters, January 24, 2012

More Blog Posts:
Multibillion-Dollar Stanford Securities Fraud Scam Has Investors Contacting Houston Stockbroker Fraud Lawyers for Help, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, February 19, 2009

Ex-SEC Lawyer to Settle DOJ Charges Accusing Him of Inappropriately Representing Ponzi Fraudster Allen Stanford, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, January 12, 2012

Securities Fraud Lawsuit Names NRP Financial Inc. in 0M Minnesota Ponzi Scam, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, January 10, 2012


Stock Broker Fraud Blog

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
January 25, 2012 by Admin

Unsealed Documents in $54.4M FINRA Arbitration Case Reveal that Citigroup Did Not Disclose Municipal Bond Risks to Investors

Last month, a US judge refused Citigroup’s request to overturn a .1M arbitration award that a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel had ordered the financial firm to pay investors Gerald D. Hosier, Jerry Murdock Jr. and Brush Creek Capital. The award was the largest amount ever granted to individuals in a securities arbitration proceeding.

Following Citigroup’s request that a United States district court toss out the award, details from what were confidential proceedings have been unsealed. According to the New York Times, documents viewed by the arbitrators show that on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 signifying the highest risk (usually only assigned to products that potentially carried the risk of an investor losing everything), Citigroup rated these investments as having a 5 rating for risk. Is it no wonder then that investors could and would go on to lose 80% of what they had investments.

The investments, which were municipal arbitrage portfolios, are known as ASTA/MAT. Citigroup Global Markets sold them through MAT Finance LLC.

Per internal e-mails, after the investments began declining in value in early 2008, when Citigroup wealth management head Sallie Krawcheck asked for the MAT’s risk rating,” She was told that it was “3-5.” Also, customers were never told about the 5 rating that their investments were previously given. The Times also reported that during a conference call involving brokers whose clients had sustained losses, the portfolio manager was directed to not discuss internal guidelines, which contained different information than what was in the prospectus that investors had received.

Citigroup eventually would offer to buy back the investments at a discount price but only if investors agreed to not file a securities fraud lawsuit against the financial firm. (Brokers have said they felt pressured by Citigroup to get investors on board with this. For example, a memo with the heading “Fund Rescue Options “noted that if the broker’s client let Citigroup repurchase the instruments, this would not be noted in his/her U-5 regulatory record. If, however, the client chose to sue, then this would appear in the broker’s U-5.)

In their securities fraud case, Claimants accused Citigroup of failure to supervise, fraud, and unsuitability. After the FINRA arbitration panel ordered them to pay the investors, Citigroup argued that panel members had ignored the law and contended that despite verbal statements made to investors, the latter had signed agreements acknowledging that the risk of losing everything was a possibility. Judge Christine Arguello would go on to affirm the FINRA panel’s decision. While the majority of the award was compensation for the claimants’ investment losses, about million was for punitive damages.

Secrets of a Sales Machine, NY Times, January 14, 2012

Citigroup Slammed With Million Award by FINRA Arbitrators in MAT/ASTA Case, Forbes, April 12, 2011

More Blog Posts:
Citigroup Request to Overturn .1M Municipal Bond Arbitration Ruling Denied by Judge, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, December 27, 2011

Citigroup Global Markets Settles for 5,000 FINRA Fine Over Failure to Disclose Conflicts of Interest, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, January 20, 2012

Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Sues Two Saudi Investors in an Attempt to Block Their FINRA Arbitration Claim Over 3M in Losses, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, October 22, 2012


Stock Broker Fraud Blog

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
November 26, 2011 by Admin

Accounting Firm Sued In Ponzi Scheme Case

Guest Post by Brian Mahany Here is a new twist. A hedge fund sues an accounting firm for its failure to uncover a Ponzi scheme operated by one of the hedge fund’s traders. That might sound farfetched, but its not. New York accounting firm Rothstein Kass was sued by two hedge fund managers in San [...]
Sequence Inc. Fraud Files Blog

Tags: , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
November 18, 2011 by Admin

Whistleblower Case Study: Independent Internal Investigations

From my Thought Leadership series at Securities Docket: When a whistleblower goes to a government agency with allegations of fraud and corruption, no one knows whether the government will act. The more detailed and credible the allegations, the more likely the government will ask questions.  The company may even have the great “fortune” of being [...]
Sequence Inc. Fraud Files Blog

Tags: , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
September 23, 2011 by Admin

Whistleblowers, Accounting Fraud, and Internal Investigations (A Case Study)

Compliance professionals can talk at length about the importance of conducting internal investigations when there are whistleblower reports of fraud, corruption, and other questionable behavior. But what actually matters is doing something when the time comes. This case study  illustrates how one public company did it right to head off big trouble when the SEC [...]
Sequence Inc. Fraud Files Blog

Tags: , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
September 11, 2011 by Admin

Wedbush Securities Ordered by FINRA to Pay $2.8M in Senior Financial Fraud Case Over Variable Annuities

A FINRA arbitration panel has fined Wedbush Securities Incorporated, founder Edward Wedbush, and broker Debbie Michelle Saleh to pay ,865,885 in damages. The victim of this securities case was Rick Cooper, an elderly investor. His securities claim alleged breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, failure to supervise, intentional misrepresentation and omissions, unauthorized transaction, unsuitable transactions, emotional abuse, elder abuse, and churning related to transactions of unspecified variable annuities.

Cooper’s securities fraud lawyers claim that Saleh sent him bogus monthly account statements, forged his signature, and conducted transactions that he hadn’t authorized, including the buying and selling of annuities and other financial products that were not suitable for him.

While Cooper’s account balances went down to one-third of .86 million, Saleh is accused of making money from fees and commissions that she charged him. The FINRA panel found that Saleh purposely misrepresented information about Cooper’s investments and she did make unauthorized transactions. The panel believes that Saleh of acting intentionally to defraud her clients. They said her actions either bordered on or actually were acts of “criminal misconduct.”

Of the .9 million, Saleh must pay 0,000 plus million in punitive damages. Wedbush and its founder have to pay 0,000. Saleh, Wedbush, and Edward Wedbush also have to pay 10% annual interest on the damages, Cooper’s legal fees, and his other costs. Wedbush has to pay 100% of the arbitration forum fees, which is about ,300. Two years ago, Saleh, who is no longer with Wedbush, has been permanently barred from the securities by FINRA.

Cooper is not the only person to file a securities claim against Saleh accusing her of misconduct. She is at the center of 4 investigations and 10 client complaints.

Wedbush has been named in at least 53 regulatory events and 52 arbitrations. Failure to supervise was a common complaint.

Failure to Supervise
Our securities fraud lawyers cannot stress how important it is for broker-dealers and investment advisers to properly supervise their brokers, advisers, other employees, and independent contractors. Not only must appropriate supervision take place, but also procedures of supervision have to be designed, implemented, and executed. Also, an employee assigned a supervisory role must complete specialized training to receiver a supervisor license from the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD).

In the event that the broker engages in any type of misconduct or other wrongdoing, his/her supervisor and the financial firm can be held liable for allowing the alleged acts to take place—even if the employee that actually engaged in the wrongdoing isn’t found liable. You will want to work with a securities fraud law firm that knows how to prove that failure to supervise occurred.

FINRA Panel Orders Wedbush, Former Broker to Pay Investor .9M, OnWallStreet.com, August 31, 2011

FINRA Arbitrators Award Millions in Elder Abuse Case, Forbes, September 1, 2011


More Blog Posts:

FINRA Panel Orders Wedbush Securities to Pay 3,000 in Securities Fraud Damages, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, March 28, 2011

Wedbush Ordered By FINRA Panel To Pay .5M to Trader Over Withheld Compensation, Institutional Investor Securities Blog, July 16, 2011

SEC Charges Filed in M Ponzi Scam that Targeted Florida Teachers and Retirees, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, August 29, 2011

If you believe that you were the victim of failure to supervise by any financial firm, contact Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas, LLP today.

Stock Broker Fraud Blog

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
September 8, 2011 by Admin

Morgan Keegan & Company Ordered by FINRA to Pay $555,400 in Texas Securities Case Involving Morgan Keegan Proprietary Funds

A FINRA panel in Houston has ordered Morgan Keegan & Company to pay the Claimants of a Texas securities fraud 5,400 in compensatory damages. The Claimants had accused the financial firm of misrepresentation, negligence, vicarious liability, failure to supervise and violating the Texas Securities Act, the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and NASD Rules.

The securities claim is related to the sale and recommendation of a number of Regions Morgan Keegan proprietary mutual funds that were allegedly touted as diversified, conservative, and low risk despite a supposed higher rate of return:

• Regions Morgan Keegan High Income Fund
• Regions Morgan Keegan Advantage Income Fund
• Regions Morgan Keegan Multi-Sector High Income Fund
• Regions Morgan Keegan Strategic Income Fund

The funds were actually high-risk mortgage-backed securities that were not appropriate for the Claimants.

After a 5-day hearing, the panel found Morgan Keegan liable in the Texas securities case and ordered the financial firm to pay damages to the WCR Family Limited Partnership, as well as a 4% per annum interest on the 0,4000 for the period of July 29, 2011 until payment is made in full. The panel did dismiss all claims brought by the Wilhelmina R. Smith Estate.

Morgan Keegan Securities Fraud Cases
For the past couple of years, our Texas stockbroker fraud law firm has been diligently pursuing claims against Morgan Keegan related to their Regions Morgan Funds. The cases came following claims by investors that the financial firm defrauded them by misrepresenting the risk involved in the investments. Investors sustained many of the losses when the subprime mortgage market collapsed.

Over 400 securities claims have been filed over Morgan Keegan’s RMK funds. Already tens of millions of dollars have been awarded to claimants.

Other RMK funds named in the claims include the:

• RMK Select Intermediate Bond Fund
• RMK Select High Income Fund

Earlier this summer, Regions Financial Corp. agreed to pay 0 million to settle more securities allegations that it fraudulently marketed mutual funds with subprime mortgages while artificially raising the prices of the funds. FINRA, SEC, and regulators from Kentucky, Alabama, South Carolina, and Mississippi agreed to the settlement.

Examples of FINRA arbitration settlements that Morgan Keegan has been ordered to pay over the RMK Funds:

• 1,000 to several investors. The claimants said their actions were over SEC and FINRA violations, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, failure to supervise, vicarious liability, negligence, and breach of contract.

• .5 million to investor Andrew Stein and his companies. Panel members held Morgan Keegan liable for negligence, failure to supervise, and the sale of unsuitable investments.

Related Web Resources:

Regions Settles S.E.C. Case Over Former Morgan Keegan Funds, NY Times, June 22, 2011

Regions settles fraud case, may sell Morgan Keegan, Reuters, June 22, 2011

Texas Securities Act

More Blog Posts:
Morgan Keegan Settles Subprime Mortgage-Backed Securities Charges for 0M, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, June 29, 2011

Morgan Keegan Ordered by FINRA to Pay RMK Fund Investors 1,000, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, April 24, 2011

Morgan Keegan Ordered by FINRA Panel to Pay Investor .5 Million for Bond Fund Losses, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, February 23, 2010

Contact our Houston securities fraud law firm to request your free consultation.

Stock Broker Fraud Blog

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •
September 6, 2011 by Admin

Complaint | RICO Case Against JP Morgan/Chase – LINDA ZIMMERMAN V JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA

Here it is all… THIRTY-TWO PLAINTIFFS FILE RICO ACTION AGAINST JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AND CHASE HOME FINANCE Thirty-two Plaintiffs have filed a multi-count Complaint in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida against JPMorgan Chase Bank and Chase Home Finance, LLC. The Plaintiffs retained Jeff Barnes, Esq., whose Firm, W. J. Barnes, P.A., filed … Read more
Foreclosure Fraud – Fighting Foreclosure Fraud by Sharing the Knowledge

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  •   •   •   •   •